Newsworthy Animal Stories of 2012 – Part 5: A Monkey’s Better Everyday Life

This is the last in a 5 part series on animals that made the Toronto news in 2012. While these stories are local, the issues they present are global, each one asking us to scrutinize and reassess our relationship with captive wild animals.

Read:  Part 1: The Boys | Part 2 : The Ladies | Part 3: Flying Monkeys | Part 4: Whales, Walruses & Whistleblowers |

Darwin the Ikea Monkey: A Better Everyday Life ..with his own kind

“He was not a dog, he was not a cat, he was a little person.” (Owner, Yasmin Nakhuda)

Darwin at Ikea (Bronwyn Page)

Darwin at Ikea (Bronwyn Page)

As the biggest viral story ever to leave Toronto, this list would not be complete without Darwin, the “Ikea Monkey.”

On December 9th, shoppers at a north Toronto Ikea store were surprised to see a small monkey wearing an oversized faux-shearling coat and a diaper wandering around the parking lot. The 7 month old Japanese macaque had apparently freed itself from its crate and escaped the car where he had been waiting for his owner’s return.

As people snapped pictures with their phones and tweeted them out, Ikea security managed to confine the monkey until Toronto’s Animal Services arrived and picked him up. The next day they delivered him to Story Book Farm Primate Sanctuary in Sunderland, about 100 km northeast of Toronto. It’s illegal to keep a monkey as a pet in Toronto, so even after his owner, Yasmin Nakhuda, paid her $240 fine, the monkey was not returned to her.

Not unexpectedly, Nakhuda was heartbroken. She filed a lawsuit [motion here ] to get the monkey back but at the December 21st hearing, the judge ruled that the monkey would remain in the care of the Story Book Farm until after Christmas.

This is where things got interesting. Nakhuda stated that if she got the monkey back, she would move to Kawartha Lakes, the nearest township that allowed monkeys as pets. At that, the Kawartha Lakes city council began taking action to change the bylaws to ban ownership of pet monkeys. The city of Oshawa (where the hearing was held), quickly proposed a similar bylaw. Could it be that this case will be the one that gets Ontario to start tightening its exotic pet laws?

Nakhuda insists that she treated the monkey well, calling him her “child” and using the misguided logic that:

“”Japanese macaques, they have 93 per cent human DNA. So, he would act like a little child, and therefore when I call him my son I’m not mental,” she said.”  (The Independent, Dec 20, 2012)

First, no, they don’t have “human DNA.”  93% of their DNA is the same as ours because we both descended from a common ancestor  not that long ago (~  30MYA) in evolutionary time.  By Nakhuda’s logic, we could also say humans have 93% macaque DNA and therefore a macaque would make a suitable parent for a human baby. See how that doesn’t work? It’s also useful to keep in mind that we share 92% of our DNA with mice.

Of course, the public is divided on what should become of Darwin. Many commenters have pointed out that Nakhuda is the only “mother” Darwin has ever known, and they argue that to take him away from her does more harm than good.  Some supporters have even gone as far as accusing Storybook Farms of mistreating their animals in order to prevent them from keeping Darwin.

Others people argue that the monkey never should have been in a human home to begin with and that he should be reintroduced to a macaque family. To this point, I can’t really improve on Andrew Westoll’s well thought out response:

Darwin does need his mother. But here’s the rub (which I can’t believe this story necessitates pointing out): Nakhuda isn’t Darwin’s mother…

.. What Darwin needs now is much more than simply a warm primate body to snuggle with. He needs to be socialized with other monkeys of his kind as soon as possible, to kick-start the emotional and cognitive development that has surely been stunted by being raised in a human home.

…Darwin needs to feel safe and to be safe, to not be left alone in cars outside shopping malls.  

Darwin a year from now, and for the next 25 years. (Wikipedia)

Darwin 3 years from now, and for the next 25 years. (Wikipedia)

Westoll goes on to explain that while we might not see teeth brushing, bathing, and putting clothing on a monkey as cruel, it most certainly is.  There is nothing in the animal’s biology or experience that prepares it for this kind of treatment.  In addition, Darwin is not going to stay a cute little baby monkey forever.

“Darwin is going to be 45 to 50 pounds when he’s full grown,” she said. “His canines (teeth) are going to be half an inch. (Lisa Whitaker, Durham Region News, Dec 22, 2012)

And as an adult male primate, he is not going to accept being treated like an infant, being carried from place to place, dressed in cute outfits, and riding on “mom’s” shoulders while she runs on the treadmill. He will be a sexually mature male primate with all that comes with that – the drive for dominance, independence and reproduction.  I am at a loss to understand how Nakhuda thinks she will provide any of that to Darwin.

The case goes back to court on January 31st.

UPDATE: This just crossed my desk via anthropologist/primatologist Katie MacKinnon (@ktcapuchin) on Twitter. It’s a must-see if you still think it’s ok to own a pet monkey. ‘Broken Bonds’ is the trailer for a documentary about monkeys born behind bars. You will also see clips from ‘My Child is a Monkey’ in this video, where you will see a breeder selling a baby monkey, and two monkeys who were confiscated.

More here: Jungle Friends Primate Sanctuary

Comments (3)

Bill SwanJanuary 14th, 2013 at 9:59 am

/Reversing the DNA argument is demolishes it.

GwynnJanuary 14th, 2013 at 10:34 am

That video clip is heartbreaking.

[…] those of you who missed the original tale, I blogged on it back in January here: A Monkey’s Better Everyday Life.  In short, On December 9th 2012, a 7 month old Japanese macaque named Darwin escaped the car where […]

Leave a comment

Your comment